Bluejay

Tasty pumpkin pie

Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:51:27 GMT

8oz cream cheese, softened
1 (15oz) can pumpkin
1 cup sugar
1/4 tsp salt
2 eggs, slightly beaten
1 cup half-and-half
1/4 cup (1/2 stick) melted butter
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1/2 teaspoon ground cinnamon
1/4 teaspoon ground ginger, optional
Probably other spices would work too.
2 frozen pie crusts (the recipe called for 1, but the above made too much.)

Mix ingredients in roughly the above order, then pour into pie crusts. Preheat oven to 425, cook for 15 minutes, lower temperature to 350, bake for 40-50 minutes or until knife comes out clean (which for us was around an hour and a half...). Let cool to room temperature. Apparently freezing the pie will make it separate, but you'll want to finish it in 1 sitting anyway. Top with whipped cream if you want; we forgot. The top comes out caramelized, and not looking like any pumpkin pie I've seen, but it was delicious. Sorry, I forgot to take pictures.

I also had no idea cranberry sauce was so easy to make: 1 cup water; 1 cup sugar, 4 cups == 12 oz cranberries, spices like cinnamon, nutmeg, cloves, etc. Boil to dissolve the sugar, then add cranberries and simmer until the cranberries burst and the sauce gels, then let cool. Remember to save some for when the guests arrive.

The Passover Election

Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:48:06 GMT

In celebrating Passover, there's a tradition of mixing sweet charoset and bitter horseradish to commemorate the sweetness of freedom combined with the bitterness of either slavery or the plagues that hurt innocent Egyptians in the process of escaping from Egypt. Last week, we had the incredible sweetness of Barack Obama's election and the awful bitterness of three more states passing anti-gay marriage legislation, especially after California's 5-month tease. We still don't know whether marriages performed during those 5 months will remain valid.

I'm also reminded of the song Dayenu, "It would have been enough". Some of the verses are:

Had he brought us out of Egypt, and not divided the sea for us, Dayenu!
Had he divided the sea, and not permitted us to cross on dry land, Dayenu!
Had he permitted us to cross the sea on dry land, and not sustained us for forty years in the desert, Dayenu!
Had he sustained us for forty years in the desert, and not fed us with manna, Dayenu!
Had he fed us with manna, and not ordained the Sabbath, Dayenu!
etc.

I've always questioned this song, since if God had brought the Israelites out of Egypt and not divided the sea, the army would have brought them right back into Egypt. But it still seems remarkably appropriate for this election. We got Obama but not gay marriage. Was it enough?

Barack Obama's family watching the election results

Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:05:40 GMT

http://flickr.com/photos/barackobamadotcom/sets/72157608716313371/

Obama's original acceptance speech

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:57:04 GMT

NOBODY expects Barack Obama! Our chief strength is liberty...liberty and democracy...democracy and liberty.... Our two strengths are democracy and liberty...and opportunity.... Our *three* strengths are democracy, liberty, and opportunity...and unyielding hope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our strengths.... Amongst our strengths...are such elements as democracy, liberty.... I'll come in again.

Election!

Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:04:17 GMT

I voted this morning. A couple elections ago (probably still this year; we're on our third...), I signed up to be a permanent absentee voter, which means they always mail me an absentee ballot, even if I don't wind up using it. So I filled it out last night (12 state-wide propositions, 22 city propositions, 1 speaker of the house, 2 statewide offices, school board and college board, and city supervisor), and dropped it off at city hall this morning at 8:05, 5 minutes after the early voting opened today. The front people in line had been waiting 20 minutes, and the line was already to the corner. Not as bad, of course, as 3.5 hours of waiting. Cool that people are voting!

Tomorrow (and the reason I voted early), I'm waking up around 5:00am to get to the East Bay by 6:15 to talk to people standing in their lines to go vote starting at 7:00. I'll be there all day until 8:30pm; wish me luck!

I'm pessimistic about our chances; the Obama turnout surge seems likely to be concentrated in the black and hispanic ethnic groups, which tend to be more religious and so vote 'yes' more often. But I'll do what I can.

Successful dinner

Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:48:30 GMT

I've got a cold, so I stayed home from work today, after which I was presented with the problem of what to make for dinner. I've recently decided that the way to learn how to cook is to do it a bunch, and finding a real recipe dissuades me from doing it, so I've given up on real recipes. So:

Buy an onion, a bell pepper, a carrot, a tomato, a bunch of spinach, some eggs, and some cheese.
Cut up the above, except for the spinach and eggs. Scramble 2 eggs; wash the spinach.
In a bit of olive oil, cook the onion and carrot until they are nearly dead. (Where by "dead", I mean soft and sweet.)
Add the bell pepper and cook until everything's dead. Hopefully the bell pepper, onion, and carrot arrive at deadness at the same time, although the great thing about these vegetables is that you can be off by quite a bit and it's still good. After this step, none of them will cook much more.
Add the tomato. Tomatoes are very wet. I didn't let all the juice boil off, but that's something to vary next time.
I added spices (black pepper, salt, basil, crushed red pepper) here. No idea if that's the right time.
Add the spinach. Let it do the scrunchy spinach thing.
Pour over the eggs. I have no idea what the right thing to do here is. I tend to stir, and scrape the cooked egg off the pan, but I wind up with very small chunks of cooked eggs, that don't really resemble what other people have cooked when they did similar things. Another thing to try differently next time.
Add the cheese at the very end so it just melts.
Pour onto a plate.
Eat.

It doesn't wind up looking pretty, but it tastes good.

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:11:22 GMT

W00t! They demonstrated macro-evolution in the lab: http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/dn14094-bacteria-make-major-evolutionary-shift-in-the-lab.html

Not that this'll convince the more die-hard creationists, but it's another lever we can use.

Good election day

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:03:28 GMT

Obama finished winning the nomination.
Prop 98 (which would kill rent control) lost. http://vote.sos.ca.gov/Returns/props/59.htm
Prop 99 (which prevents cities from taking your house and giving it to WalMart) won. It's not perfect—if you're a small business they can still give your land to WalMart—but it's something and will hopefully kill the other eminent-domain-reform-plus-conservative-nastiness propositions that have been floating around since Kelo vs. New London.
SF's Prop G won, so redevelopment may finally start in the Bayview. http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp?id=70719
SF's Prop F (which would require 50% of the Bayview development to be "affordable", with no subsidy) lost, so development won't be killed off the bat. We really should have more affordable housing, but it deserves to be subsidized by the city. Prop F looked like just an attempt to prevent anything from being built.

Burning man

Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:09:39 GMT

Well, I haven't posted here in a long while, but I figured I'd let y'all know that I'm going to Burning Man. For anyone else going, I'll be camping with the Scorpions
See y'all there.

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:32:11 GMT

Two Parties

Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:19:26 GMT

Posting here as well as here (subscribe to jyasskin) so more people see it. I'm having two parties celebrating my departure to accommodate both people who work on weekends and people who work on weekdays. Both will be at Aphrodite’s. The first will be Monday, July 11, starting some time in the afternoon, and continuing until around 1:00. The second will be Saturday, July 16, after the priest salon. If you only want to come to the party, I estimate it'll start around 8-9, and again continue until around 1-2.

Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:47:36 GMT

The Priest Salon will be on Saturday, July 16 at Aphrodite's, starting at 3:00 in the afternoon and continuing until people get bored some time in the evening, at which point we will begin a party to celebrate/mourn me leaving. We will order dinner, and people are welcome to bring snack-type foods.

Doc and Bran are scheduled to speak. Some possible topics are:

Becoming a priest
What priests do
How priests are the same and different from priestesses
Any other questions you can think of. If you'd like people to think about them ahead of time, you can post them in the comments.

Please invite anyone, male or female, who you think might get something out of the salon or have something to contribute. See you guys there.

Trying out a beard

Sat, 28 May 2005 05:29:39 GMT

Downside: can no longer itch my hands on my stubble.

Upside (maybe): look like a hippie. (Now where's that digital camera?)

Warrior isn't in the female progression

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 05:58:06 GMT

The traditional female life cycle is Maiden, Mother, Crone. Some wymyn want to add a fourth "Warrior" stage. This is silly. According to the CMA Beltaine ritual, the stages of the male life cycle are Warrior, Chieftain, and Sage. I've heard some disagreement about Chieftain, but Warrior seems pretty standard. Now, take Artemis — the "virgin huntress" — as the archetypal female Warrior. What's wrong with saying that she's acting in a male life-cycle stage? It doesn't make her any less a woman; she's just acting outside her gender's "natural" roles.

Women can be Warriors and Chieftains just as men can be Maidens and Fathers. All of these roles are worthy, whatever the gender of the person playing them. But if you're going to say that some things are inherently female, then some things must also be inherently male.

Ave Hermes

Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:35:54 GMT

Last night, we went over to gypsydragon's to make banners for CMA. I noticed something on her altar and asked what the "neat magnifying glass with ears" was. She replied that it was Hermes' symbol, a mirror with wings, and that it was there to try to avoid trouble from the current Mercury retrograde. Oops.

Later that night, it fell to me to pick up opheliasavalon and funny_lil_loser and bring them over to the movie night Aphrodite's was hosting. So I started driving over to their place. I noticed that I was hitting all green lights, which never happens on that drive. Hermes is a trickster god who rules travel and communication, among other things, so at this point I started getting nervous.

When I got close to their apartment, I called to have them come down and meet me in the parking lot. "We're at Hyde Park Grill and just ordered. You were supposed to call us from Aphrodite's." Of course, I was in the car when those arrangements were made, just not listening. Things worked out in the end: they were able to get their food to go and come to the movie anyway. Hermes isn't a malicious god, but he plays excellent practical jokes.

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:12:45 GMT

From Neil Gaiman's blog: http://www.theliteracysite.com/. Go give books to poor children.

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:10:54 GMT

"Yet the shills are more welcome than ever in the nation's television newsrooms. That's because the big networks have chosen to be fair instead of objective. The reason for their choice? Being fair is easier. Rather than digging up facts and seeking out expert analysis, the newshounds can call in a couple of shills from either side of an issue to shout at each other. Doing it that way saves a whole lot of time and hard work. What's more, the anchors don't ever need to think about the issues for themselves."-- Daniel Altman on October 13th

Daniel Altman (incidentally, the author of Neoconomy: George Bush's Revolutionary Gamble With America's Future) agrees with Jon Stewart's point on Crossfire and has given it a name: "fair" versus "objective". This lets us see that Fox's tagline, "Fair and Balanced," is actually correct. They are fair and balanced, presenting someone from each side of an issue to respond to issues framed in a clearly non-objective manner.

My response to Microsoft

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:49:10 GMT

Recently, Microsoft asked me if I would be "interested in considering [them] for Full Time opportunities." This is the reply I sent back:

I probably ought to say that I am interested in Microsoft for a full time job and that I'd love to fly up to Seattle on your expense account and then string you along for weeks, using your offer to bargain with other potential employers. But I'm not that dishonest. Instead, I'll simply admit that, while Microsoft may be a very nice place to work, it's simply on the wrong side of too many issues I care about (patents, open source, competition), and until Microsoft becomes a better participant in the software ecosystem, I can't work there.

I'm putting this text in the Public Domain. That means you can copy it, modify it, or do anything else you like with it.

I realize that not everyone feels as strongly as I do about Microsoft. But if you do, when Microsoft comes asking to hire you, I'd appreciate it if you also sent them a response in this spirit. Maybe if enough of us do it, they'll finally change their ways.

Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:51:46 GMT

Recently, I've seen several blogs, most recently this one, claim that the forgery of CBS's memos will cost Kerry the election. I tend to think that's premature. Even if a Democrat forged the memos and intentionally sent them to CBS, I think Kerry can get out of it. Bush has managed to completely avoid any fallout from the Swift Boat attack ads after all. Of course, that assumes that Kerry can run a competent campaign, an assumption I am increasingly worried about.

Fri, 03 Sep 2004 18:41:40 GMT

To all you English teachers out there.

"Every person I've talked to while writing this essay seems to have felt the same about English classes-- that the whole process seemed pointless. But none of us had the balls at the time to hypothesize that it was, in fact, all a mistake. We all thought there was just something we weren't getting." —The Age of the Essay by Paul Graham

A more substantial update should follow within a few days, I hope.

On licenses

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 04:51:39 GMT

I haven't really been thinking about OSS licenses any more lately, but my thoughts seem to have gelled recently, as much as I think they ever will.

I think wasted energy is wrong, probably in a moral sense. If anyone puts an effort toward doing something that could have been accomplished more easily, something is wrong with the world. I don't mean to imply that things like raking sand gardens are wrong: their purpose is not to make pretty patterns in sand. Also, wasted effort isn't a huge evil; certainly smaller than avoidable pain or death. Now, if I want to accomplish something with software (and I frequently do), and someone else has already done the same thing, I'm wasting energy if I write it again. Similarly, if I write a library, and someone wants to do the same thing, I am morally wronging them if I deny them the use of it.

So, what license do I have to use for my software? Closed source is clearly out. So I have a general choice between BSD and GPL-style licenses. BSD-style licenses tend to require that any copyright notice stay intact but otherwise put very few restrictions on how other people use the code. Here, I'm including the public domain under BSD-style licenses even though they're not exactly the same.

The GPL requires that anyone who uses my code also give everyone the same access to their code. This has the practical implication that many other people are forbidden from using my code. Again, I'm grouping other restrictive licenses with the GPL, particularly ones that also include some restrictions on patents. The GPL is just the best-known license in this class.

On the one hand, a BSD license allows everyone else to use the software, while GPL excludes some people, usually closed-source developers. On the other hand, the people the GPL excludes are those who are acting immorally anyway. This brings up issues of how much wrong I can do to fight wrong-doers. The purpose of the GPL is to coerce people into doing right. I'm generally doing less wrong than they are, since they can still see my code and incorporate my ideas; they just have to waste the effort of writing and debugging their code. But I'm still compromising my ideals in order to fight theirs.

On the third hand, some of the people who can't use my code are other open source developers, who have done nothing more wrong than to pick a different restrictive license that is subtly incompatible with my choice. Sure, I can't use their code either, so I'm just getting them back; but in this case, the GPL has completely missed its target.

In the end, despite this argument that seems to prove that I ought to always use a BSD-style license (or just dump my work in the public domain), I still lean toward using the GPL or LGPL. I guess the thought of someone using my work and then keeping theirs secret annoys me enough that I'm willing to slightly compromise my morals. Anyway, they can always release their code in order to use mine. And the GPL is by far the most popular restrictive license, so I'm not hurting very many people. (This may change in a year or two when the (incompatible) GPLv3 is released.)

Always, of course, I must work for the release of any corporate code I work on.

Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:22:46 GMT

I just received an email from an aunt asking that I sign this petition. It asks the United Nations to adopt an "Anti-Semitism Resolution" that basically says, "We've already adopted all these resolutions prohibiting intolerance based on religion. They apply extra specially to Jews." Sounds pretty redundant to me. Possibly counter-productive: why are hate crimes against Jews worse than hate crimes against other groups? I have seen reports of rising anti-semitism, but I haven't seen any that say that law enforcement has been reluctant to prosecute those who commit anti-semitic crimes. That says to me that governments aren't doing anything wrong, and the UN doesn't need to get involved.

Instead, maybe we need to look at some root causes. And get a thicker skin. Criticizing Israel is not anti-semitism. Even comparing Sharon to Hitler isn't anti-semitic. (Sure, it's anti-Sharon.) It's pretty standard fare to compare war criminals to Nazis.

Saying that all Jews are evil because of Israel's crimes is anti-semitic, but this over-generalization is in good company. How many Jews have you heard saying that Arabs can't be trusted or are violent because they've seen some suicide bombers on the news? The World Jewish Congress's motto doesn't help: "All Jews are responsible for one another." Well then, they admitted it. I'm responsible for Sharon's and Israel's war crimes. Can we really be surprised when some street thug decides to punish me for them?

Well-put argument against DRM

Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:19:46 GMT

That's "Digital Restrictions/Rights Management" for the uncultured among you. Cory Doctorow of the EFF gave this presentation to Microsoft, of all companies. It's the best argument against DRM that I've seen. And it's public domain, so go ahead and copy it or pieces into your own rants.

What can be done with CSS

Sun, 30 May 2004 21:47:49 GMT

The CSS Zen Garden is an illustration of how much can be done with just CSS. The HTML on the site is identical for all of the designs; only the CSS changes. Some of the designs are surprisingly pretty, so go visit even if you're not a web designer.

I even hear that mnemonic looks different in IE and Mozilla/Opera/Safari.

Sat, 22 May 2004 22:28:52 GMT

To all you recent graduates: Jon Stewart's commencement address